Why Social Pragmatic Progress Is Real—But Hard to See

In my years of clinical practice, I’ve witnessed firsthand the powerful transformations that can take place in students receiving high-quality, evidence-based therapy for social pragmatic deficits. I’ve also seen something else: the frustration, sometimes shared by parents, educators, and even therapists, when those gains aren’t as obvious or easy to measure as progress in other areas like reading or writing.

So why is it that, even after years of dedicated intervention, social pragmatic growth can still feel elusive?

The Dynamic Nature of Pragmatics

Unlike phonics or sentence structure, pragmatic language isn’t static. It’s dynamic, fluid, and deeply context-dependent. Children and adolescents are constantly navigating evolving social landscapes—negotiating friendships, understanding sarcasm, adapting to shifting classroom expectations, reading the room during group work, or picking up on subtle nonverbal cues in fast-paced conversations. These demands become exponentially more complex with age.

As typical peers mature, they rapidly internalize and adapt to this growing complexity. But for students with social pragmatic difficulties, this means the bar is constantly rising. What may have seemed like solid progress at age 8 may no longer be sufficient by age 11. It’s not that gains haven’t occurred—it’s that the demands have changed.

One Step Forward, New Hurdles Ahead

This ever-shifting target means that even when a child makes meaningful progress—like learning to initiate conversations, take another’s perspective, or respond appropriately in a group setting—they may still struggle when new layers of complexity are introduced. Humor, double meanings, implied intentions, and nuanced group dynamics all become more central in pre-adolescence and adolescence, revealing areas still under construction.

It’s important to understand: this isn’t a failure of therapy. It’s the nature of pragmatics.

Why It’s Hard to “Catch Up”

There’s also a cumulative effect to consider. Typically developing peers aren’t just progressing—they’re practicing these skills hundreds of times a day across diverse environments. They’re exposed to feedback loops that reinforce pragmatic reasoning in real time.

Students with social pragmatic challenges often have fewer successful social exchanges, which means fewer opportunities to practice, refine, and internalize these skills. Even with therapy, they’re often playing catch-up in a game where the rules are constantly changing.

But Make No Mistake: The Gains Are Real

Despite these challenges, the gains we see in and outside of therapy are incredibly meaningful. I’ve worked with students who went from being entirely isolated to joining group projects, initiating conversations, or advocating for themselves in difficult situations. These shifts may not show up too readily on psychometrically sound pragmatic tests, but they are life-changing.

Sometimes the gains are subtle: a more attuned response, a more appropriate question, a moment of emotional insight. Other times, they’re dramatic: improved peer relationships, greater classroom participation, or more independent social navigation.

And yes, while these gains may appear more modest compared to the visible leaps we often observe in decoding or writing fluency, they are no less important. In fact, for many students, they are the foundation upon which academic and emotional success is built.

Measuring What Matters

We must broaden our lens for measuring growth in pragmatic skills. Not every gain will be immediate, linear, or measurable by standardized tests. But when a student uses a coping strategy during a social conflict, understands irony or sarcasm in text, recognizes when a joke is meant to be friendly—not hurtful, pauses to ask a clarifying question instead of reacting impulsively, notices a peer is feeling left out and chooses to include them, adjusts their volume to join a group conversation, realizes a classmate’s sarcasm isn’t meant to be literal, or understands that a friend’s silence signals distress—not disinterest—that’s real, meaningful progress. That’s impact!

Let’s recognize the depth of what we’re teaching, the resilience of our students, and the powerful, often unseen breakthroughs that shape their path forward every day.

References:

1. Adams, C., Lockton, E., Gaile, J., Earl, G., & Freed, J. (2012). Implementation of a manualized communication intervention for school-aged children with pragmatic and social communication needs in a randomized controlled trial: The Social Communication Intervention Project. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47(3), 245–256.
2. Chang, Y.-C., & Locke, J. (2016). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 27, 1–10.
3. Dray, J., Bowman, J., Campbell, E., Freund, M., Hodder, R., Wolfenden, L., Richards, J., Leane, C., Green, S., Lecathelinais, C., Oldmeadow, C., Attia, J., Gillham, K., & Wiggers, J. (2017). Effectiveness of a pragmatic school-based universal intervention targeting student resilience protective factors in reducing mental health problems in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 57, 74–89.
4. Parsons, L., Cordier, R., Munro, N., Joosten, A., & Speyer, R. (2017). A systematic review of pragmatic language interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. PLOS ONE, 12(4), e0172242.
5. Zhang, B., Liang, S., Chen, J., Chen, L., Chen, W., Tu, S., Hu, L., Jin, H., & Chu, L. (2022). Effectiveness of peer-mediated intervention on social skills for children with autism spectrum disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Translational Pediatrics, 11(5), 663–675.